The Executive Director of the Africa Center for Energy Policy (ACEP), Ben Boakye has provided reasons why President John Dramani Mahama should not disappoint on the Mineral Income Investment Fund (MIIF).
🔥 The Wait is OVER! 🔥
Black Friday at CompuGhana!
This Friday, 29th of November, shop up to 90% OFF on your favorite brands!
Get TVs, laptops, phones, fridges, freezers, home theaters, and more at unbeatable prices!
đź“Ť Visit any CompuGhana showroom or shop online: CLICK HERE
đź“ž Call: 0249522736
#SomethingBlackIsComing | #TheBigReveal | #CompuGhanaBlackFriday
🔥 Helloo businesspeople of Ghana! 🔥
Deal at DigiTech Ghana!
This year, January To December 2025, Get a SuperFast website up to 99% uptime for your brands!
Get a free domain, Free SSL, Free Firewall, 24/7 Tech support and a 35% discount on developer charge if you work with us!
đź“Ť Visit DigiTech Ghana website Now!!!!!: CLICK HERE
đź“ž Call: 0249522736
#SomethingBigIsComing | #TheBigReveal | #DigiTechGhana
He explained that the MIIF was created to facilitate the Agyapa Royalty Investments—a concept masterminded by former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta and his Deputy Charles Adu Boahen to sell Ghana’s gold royalties on the London Stock Exchange.
At the time the MIIF Act was passed, he said, Parliament was unaware of the true intentions behind it—the Agyapa transaction.
However, the sponsors and their numerous allies, including lawyers and financial engineers, knew exactly what they were doing: valuing Ghana’s royalties from the 48 most promising mining concessions at $1 billion and offloading 51% of that value on the stock market for around $500 million.
“We wrote a paper to highlight the distinctiveness of state royalties, arguing that it was unconscionable to treat them like any royalty streaming business. We also pointed out the flaws in assuming definite numbers for mineral deposits, including those still under exploration—the fact that the investor position and the state position are different in natural resource valuation; Investors have time limits to mineral deposits and states maintain perpetual ownership,” he said.
Ben Boakye further stated that Mr. Ofori-Atta reduced any disagreement to ideological opposition, showing his determination to push the plan forward regardless of the objections.
Read also:
Bawku crisis – Former Defence Minister Dominic Nitiwul advises
Mob Torches Ejura Police Station Following Suspect’s Death in Custody
Ejura MP Demands Autopsy Following Death of Suspect in Police Custody
Trump issues executive order to define sex between only male and female genders
“Thankfully, Ghanaians united to resist the implementation of the Agyapa transaction— perhaps saved by the election bells in 2020. Since the programme was aborted, Ghana has received $1.08 billion in royalties, of which 80% ($865.5 million) would have been tied up in the Agyapa deal in just four years and the rest of Ghana’s gold royalties in perpetuity. This starkly illustrates the poor judgment that went into the decision to sell Ghana’s gold royalties.
With Agyapa aborted, MIIF, the father of Agyapa, maintained control over the resources for its investment rather than direct development expenditure of that critical share of Ghana’s gold resources, he said.
“The royalties paid by gold-producing companies are now declared as revenue for MIIF—no effort required. MIIF’s executives are free to hold press conferences to tout their “stellar” performance when the direct efforts of gold producers generate the royalties.
While the government decimated the investments of citizens and external creditors through haircuts, MIIF remains a wealthy entity with billions of cedis in cash reserves. It funds school reunions, political events, the construction of astroturfs, politically connected small-scale mining operations, and various other investments, besides the huge administrative overheads.
“Civil society organizations (CSOs) that fought against the Agyapa deal expect that the John Dramani Mahama (JDM) government will reverse this unfortunate situation and free up cash for development. Prior to recent appointments at MIIF, some compromises were suggested by leading figures in the ruling government: one, a merger of MIIF and the Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund (GIIF) to streamline the funds and create a more purposeful development fund; and two, capping the total allocation to MIIF/GIIF at a maximum amount (e.g., $5 billion), after which all royalties would revert to the national budget.
In essence, to treat allocation to the funds as equity of the state. The current situation—where ineffective funds divert resources from the national budget for discretionary abuse by agencies—entrenches inequality and ignores the fundamental challenges facing the country: poor water supply, inadequate schools, a struggling healthcare system, while MIIF remains rich and reckless.
“As we examine the books of MIIF, the nation would be left wondering if this was/is a sovereign wealth fund or financial banditry with zero risk appetite hitherto possible in sci-fi movies. The blessings of natural resources must be spent to improve lives — love your people.”